Love Never Dies and Macbeth

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

The last couple of days have been filled with theatre. As usual, I enjoyed myself immensely.

On Monday, I attended another showing of Love Never Dies, and I enjoyed myself. It wasn’t as good as the first time, but that’s to be expected. The roles of Christine and the Phantom were played by some of the understudies, and they were ok. I wasn’t as impressed with their performances as I was with the main people. Besides that, everything else was really good. As I said in my last post, I was going to see this show one more time to see if I could catch any changes, and I did. The first noticeable change was the prologue to the show. This was shortened a bit, and one of the songs for it was cut. That was good because I feel like it didn’t fit all. The second change was with some of the lyrics. There were times when I liked the changes, and there were times when I wish they stuck with the original. Yet, overall, it didn’t affect the show too much. The last change I noticed was the end. It was definitely shorter than when I saw it last, and that made me happy. When I saw it the first time, I felt like it dragged on and just wanted it to be over. This time I was fully engaged with it and never got bored. Overall, the changes were definitely good for the show. I can’t wait for it to come to Broadway.

Today/Tonight, my theatre class went to the Globe to see Macbeth. Macbeth is one of my favorite Shakespeare shows, and it was really cool to see it live. The acting was terrific, the comedy was spot on, and the drama was dramatic enough. Yes, there were low points of the show, but that happens with all Shakespeare shows. The coolest part though was seeing a Shakespeare play in the Globe. It’s something that I will remember for the rest of my life.

Besides the theatre, not much else has really happened. Classes are winding down and last minute assignments are being finished. Next week is final exam week and that means there is going to be a lot of studying this weekend. In between all that studying, there will definitely be some fun in between. That’s it for now. Standing at the Globe for three hours as wiped me out so bed time is soon.
Until Next Time,
Jefe

Two Musicals and Two Reviews

Sunday, April 25, 2010

This past week I was able to see two more musicals on my list of ones to see, and they were Wicked and Phantom of the Opera. Both were really good, and they didn’t disappoint. Per usual, I will give my opinion on both.



So, let’s start with Wicked. Going in, I was a little bit nervous that I wasn’t going to like it because I wasn’t the hugest fan of the soundtrack, but I was blown away. The first thing that helped change my mind was the set. It was one of the coolest sets I’ve seen in awhile. In the book with the same name, the Dragon Clock is a major object, and the producers of the musical saw that. The whole musical takes place within this clock. At the very top of the stage, there is a mechanical dragon that is controlled by one of the tech people when something bad happened. The rest of the stage had gears intertwined with metal, and it looked like the inside of a clock. To get a better picture, here’s a picture of the stage.



The other thing that made it awesome was the acting. It was superb and did justice to the material. The music was also very good. It was just nice to hear both the singing and orchestrations live. Soundtracks do a good job, but live is so much better. If I had to rate this musical one to five, I would give it a four. I would definitely recommend it to my friends, and I may even see it again.



After Wicked, I saw Phantom. Phantom is my favorite musical of all time, and it was one of my life goals to see it in its original theatre, Her Majesty’s. When I found out I was going to London, I swore to myself that if I was only going to see one musical it had to be Phantom, and it was awesome. For me, there could be somewhat terrible actors and Phantom would still be awesome. Because of that, my review will focus on the acting and some particular stuff in the production. The first thing I will focus on is the Phantom. My all-time favorite Phantom is Michael Crawford. I’ve only heard him on recording, but I firmly believe that he had the best interpretation of the part. I have seen Phantom live three times, and the one I saw here is my second favorite. David Shannon did a very good interpretation of the Phantom. He decided to underplay a lot of the emotions, which I thought was good. This kind of helped show how tortured the Phantom was and how demented he was. He also did very good on all the key songs that I judge the Phantom on. The one I judge most on is Music of the Night, and he did an excellent. It was refreshing to hear a not so vibrato tenor do it.

The next person I’m going to look at is Christine. The night we went, we saw Tabitha Webb, the alternate Christine. She blew my socks off and is officially my favorite Christine. She gave the character some backbone when needed and played the innocent card when needed. She had the perfect voice and the perfect emotion throughout. I could see Christine kind of grow throughout, which is important. As for songs, she did perfectly on both Think of Me and Wishing You Were Somehow Here Again. If I had to rate her, I would give her a five out of five.

The last two I’m going to look at are Meg Giry and Raoul. There’s not much to say about these two characters, except the actors gave portrayals that I liked. The actress who played Meg gave her some spunk and sassiness that I haven’t heard/seen with Meg. Meg is usually played as a very innocent ballet girl, and I do like that. Yet, this interpretation was the best. It gave more character to Meg. The actor who played Raoul also gave more character to Raoul. The other times I have seen Phantom, Raoul is played as the cookie-cutter hero, or very two dimensional. The Raoul here gave him some backbone and some realness to the part. In short, he gave Raoul emotion where Raoul should have emotion. In the end, these two interpretations are my all-time favorite.

Before I end this review, I would like to say one thing about the show in particular and that was the Wandering Child scene. It is one of my favorite scenes in Phantom, and it was done really well here. The last two times I saw it, the scene only had a duet between the Phantom and Christine. I like this, but I really love the trio between the Phantom, Christine, and Raoul. When the trio is done, you get the feeling of both reality and fantasy. The duet between the Phantom and Christine give you the fantasy while Raoul gives you the reality. Going into Phantom here, I wasn’t expecting to see the scene. When the scene came on, I saw Raoul and I was wondering why he was there. Then, it hit me that they were going to do the trio. Shivers went down my spine and I was in complete awe by the awesomeness of the scene. Three perfect actors singing a perfect scene. What else would one want. I was in paradise for those short minutes. In the end, I would give this production a 5/5 just like the Broadway one.



After these two musicals, I have one more to go to, and it is a revisit to Love Never Dies. I’ve been hearing that things are changing with it and that it is a little different every night. So, I’m going to go to see if this is true. A review will definitely follow.


Until Next Time,
Jefe

A Really Big Post

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Sorry I haven’t updated in awhile, but I’ve pretty busy. I went without internet for a week, and I have also had a lot of school work. We’ve approached our last month here in London, and it seems the work is piling on. I have a couple more essays for my Beatles class, an essay for my theatre class, an essay for my EDU class, and a project for my Art class. The good thing though is that I’m getting a lot done and should be down to only a couple of essays in the next week. Because of my progress, I have some downtime and that means I can finally give an update. Again, I apologize for the length.
So, the best place to start this is the week that I lost internet. It was two weekends ago, and it was very frustrating. It all started two Wednesdays ago. Our internet started to not work at around 11 pm and no one thought anything about it because that tended to happen in the past. The internet would not work and would come back on later. So, we waited until morning. Our wait was fruitless because we still had no internet. This was frustrating so people decided to talk to our advisor about it. He called the place and was told that the internet would be down until next week. This made things even more frustrating because the internet is our only source of contact. To help eliminate some frustration, we found places that had free wi-fi and tried to get back to normalcy. This was helpful but still somewhat frustrating. When the internet finally came back, there was a big sigh of relief and things went back to normal. Even though there was normalcy, I still kind of wanted to go back to not having internet. This whole experienced showed me how much we depend on the internet and how plugged in we are. When we didn’t have internet, I felt like there was so much more interaction between everyone. I really liked this because I got much closer to some of the people on this trip. The good thing though is that we haven’t really lost those days when we become closer. I guess it just seemed like it happened a lot more.




The next big thing that happened to me was a day of adventures on the tube. This past week I have done a lot of traveling around London by myself. That adventuring meant some tube adventures. Basically, I tried some different ways to get places, and it was really fun. The best adventure was on a class day. I was on my way to my edu class when I missed my stop to make a line transfer. I freaked out for a moment, but then I realized that there was another way to get there. I did that way and made it successfully to class. This was the best adventure because it showed me that I knew the tube system fairly well. For the rest of the week, nothing really big happened.

On Thursday, I was able to see Les Miserables. This was actually a split second decision on my part. I had gone to the discount theatre booth with one of my friends to see about prices for tickets for Phantom. We asked and got our answer. Then, I decided to ask about tickets for Les Mis. The guy told me and I was sold. I bought one ticket for 36 pounds for a seat that would normally be 62 pounds. It was a really good deal. I went that night, and it was amazing. The performance overall was extremely good, but I did have some problems. The first was the actor who played Jean Valjean. I liked him overall, but there were moments where I did not like his choices. Also, he didn’t do well on one of the songs that I believe is a crucial song for Valjean, “Who am I.” My other problem was with the interaction between Valjean and Javert. Their interactions are crucial throughout the show, and I thought it was lacking. There really was no chemistry between them, and a lot of their scenes seemed very forced. As the show went on, the chemistry began to show and things became better. My favorite part from this performance was Marius. He nailed the part and made it very believable. In other words, he embodied Marius. The interesting thing is this show was his West End debut, and that astounded me. I had a really good night and can’t wait for my theatre filled next week.
That’s it for now. Next week will probably be a long one also because I get to see both Wicked and Phantom, along with my plays for theatre. The sad thing though is it might be one of my last ones until I leave. I can’t believe I leave in one month, but I’m ready to go. London’s been great, but I really miss home.
Until Next Time,
Jefe